Installation on your server
n8n with Docker, HTTPS, backups and controlled updates. On your infrastructure or on one we manage.
Service
n8n is the engine behind most of our automations, and it's open source. That changes the economics: you pay for a server, not for every time a workflow runs. At volume, the difference against Zapier or Make stops being marginal.
Why it matters
Per-execution platforms are comfortable until they work. When the automation succeeds and volume grows, the bill grows with it, right when it's giving you the most value. Self-hosting flips that curve: the cost flattens out.
Scope
n8n with Docker, HTTPS, backups and controlled updates. On your infrastructure or on one we manage.
Built to be readable: another developer should understand what each one does without asking us.
If your system has no node, we write one. It's JavaScript, not proprietary magic.
We rebuild what you already have and run both in parallel to verify before switching the old one off.
Testing and production kept apart, so nobody debugs in the workflow your customers depend on.
So they can adjust the simple things without calling us. The complex ones stay with us if you prefer.
Process
How many executions a month, what peaks and which integrations. That's what sizes the server, not a standard plan.
Deployment with HTTPS, access control, backups and monitoring before moving a single workflow.
Workflow by workflow, checking results against the previous system when migrating.
Each workflow with its description, its trigger and what to do if it fails.
Stack
n8n as the engine, with the minimum around it to keep it stable and observable.
FAQ
When volume grows or the logic gets complicated. With a few hundred runs a month and simple workflows, Zapier or Make are quicker to set up and need no server. From a few thousand, or if you need logic that doesn't fit a standard node, n8n comes out ahead.
Whichever you prefer. It can be in your name and managed by you, or included in a subscription plan where we handle monitoring, backups and updates. Either way, the instance and the workflows are yours.
It's a valid option if you'd rather not run a server. It costs more per execution than self-hosting but removes the maintenance. We recommend it when volume is low and nobody on the team is technical.
Related
Is this what you need?
Tell us about your case in four questions. We'll tell you honestly whether this service solves it, whether another one fits better, or whether we're not right for you.